Effect of hydroxychloroquine blood concentration on the efficacy and ocular toxicity of systemic lupus erythematosus.

In the absence of evidence-based guidance on the impact of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood concentration on efficacy and ocular toxicity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the clinical monitoring of HCQ blood concentration is not yet widely performed, which raised concerns about the necessity of conducting HCQ blood concentration monitoring. In this retrospective study, we consecutively enrolled 135 patients with SLE who received HCQ treatment for more than 6 months from July 2022 to December 2022. Ocular toxicity was evaluated by collecting relevant retinal parameters using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated using the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and relevant clinical parameters. HCQ blood concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the cumulative dose of HCQ was positively correlated with the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) perimeter and FAZ area (r = 0.734, P < 0.001; r = 0.784, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the treatment duration of HCQ was positively correlated with FAZ perimeter and FAZ area (r = 0.761, P < 0.001; r = 0.882, P < 0.001). The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that HCQ blood concentration was associated with the disease activity of patients with SLE (odds ratio 0.994, 95% CI 0.990-0.999). HCQ blood concentration may be an important factor in assessing the therapeutic effectiveness of SLE patients. The HCQ-related ocular toxicity was a long-term effect related to long term exposure, rather than the blood concentration of HCQ at the time of testing. More importantly, when addressing HCQ-related ocular toxicity, it may be crucial to pay attention to the cumulative dose and treatment duration of HCQ.

Hydroxychloroquine-induced hyperpigmentation of the skin and bull's-eye maculopathy in rheumatic patients: a case report and literature review.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is used as a traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), for the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, it can cause serious adverse reactions, including hyperpigmentation of the skin and bull's-eye macular lesions. Here, we present a case of HCQ-induced hyperpigmentation of the skin and bull's-eye macular lesions in a patient who received HCQ for RA. A 65-year-old female patient developed blurred vision and hyperpigmentation of multiple areas of skin over the body for one month after 3 years of HCQ treatment for RA. Based on clinical presentation, ophthalmological examination and dermatopathological biopsy, a diagnosis of drug-induced cutaneous hyperpigmentation and bullous maculopathy of the right eye was made. After discontinuation of HCQ and treatment with iguratimod tablets, the hyperpigmentation of the patient 's skin was gradually reduced, and the symptoms of blurred vision were not significantly improved. We also reviewed the available literature on HCQ-induced cutaneous hyperpigmentation and bull's-eye macular lesions and described the clinical features of HCQ-induced cutaneous hyperpigmentation and bull's-eye macular lesions. In conclusion, clinicians should be aware of early cutaneous symptoms and HCQ-associated ophthalmotoxicity in patients with rheumatic diseases on HCQ sulphate and should actively monitor patients, have them undergo regular ophthalmological examinations and give appropriate treatment to prevent exacerbation of symptoms.

INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE FOR THE TREATMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA SECONDARY TO HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE TOXICITY.

PURPOSE: Cystoid macular edema is a vision-threatening complication infrequently associated with hydroxychloroquine retinal toxicity. There are limited data on the best treatment for this pathology. METHODS: A retrospective case series is presented. RESULTS: In this series, we present three cases of cystoid macular edema in patients with diagnosed hydroxychloroquine maculopathy successfully treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implantation. CONCLUSION: Minimal literature has been published regarding the best management of cystoid macular edema related to hydroxychloroquine toxicity. Our case series suggests a possible new agent in the treatment of this rare occurrence.

New proposal for a multimodal imaging approach for the subclinical detection of hydroxychloroquine-induced retinal toxicity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare multimodal structural and functional diagnostic methods in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with hydroxychloroquine, to identify the best complementary approach for detecting subclinical retinal toxicity. METHODS: A cross-sectional, unicentric study was conducted on patients with SLE treated with hydroxychloroquine. Each patient underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation, comprising structural tests (spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), en face OCT, en face OCT angiography (OCTA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF)) and functional tests (automated perimetry for visual field (VF) testing, multifocal electroretinography (mfERG)). A diagnosis of macular toxicity required the presence of abnormalities in at least one structural and functional test. The Kappa Concordance Index was used to assess the concordance among the different tests in detecting potential macular toxicity-associated alterations. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with SLE (132 eyes) were consecutively enrolled. Four (6.1%) patients developed subclinical hydroxychloroquine-induced retinal toxicity without visual acuity impairment. The proportion of abnormal results was 24% for both en face OCT and en face OCTA. Regarding functional analysis, VF was less specific than mfERG in detecting subclinical retinal toxicity (VF specificity 47.5%). En face OCT and en face OCTA structural findings showed better concordance, with a kappa index >0.8, and both identified the same cases of toxicity as FAF. CONCLUSION: Although structural OCT and VF are frequently used to screen for hydroxychloroquine-induced retinal toxicity, our findings suggest that a combination of mfERG, en face OCT and en face OCTA could improve the diagnostic accuracy for subclinical retinal damage. This study emphasises the importance of a multimodal imaging strategy to promptly detect signs of hydroxychloroquine-induced retinal toxicity.

Hydroxychloroquine had neutral effect on long-term risk of malignancy in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The cancer risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients has been discussed. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) may exert protective effects against malignancy. The study investigated the association between HCQ use and the risk of subsequent malignancy in RA patients. METHODS: Catastrophic illness certificated RA patients were extracted from the National Health Insurance Research Database. The index date was set 180 days after the RA diagnosis date to avoid immortal time bias. Two groups were matched in a 1-to-1 ratio by propensity score regarding age, gender, index date, relevant comorbidities, and comedication. HCQ users prior to the diagnosis of RA were exempted to ensure compliance with the new-user design. Cancers diagnosed before or less than 180 days after the index date were excluded to mitigate protopathic bias. The study adopted the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model to examine the association between HCQ use and cancer risk. The assumption of proportional hazard was also tested. RESULTS: Based on strict criteria, we included 492 eligible RA patients and divided them into study and control groups (N = 246 in each group). HCQ users exhibited a neutral risk of cancer relative to the controls (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.44-2.21, p > .05). The assumption of proportional hazard was not violated. CONCLUSION: This study does not observe the effect of using HCQ as a primary regimen to prevent cancer in RA patients. We are assured that HCQ is not associated with an increased risk of subsequent malignancy in RA patients. Further mechanistic research is needed.

Risk of uveitis in autoimmune diseases patients treated with hydroxychloroquine: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Uveitis is a common manifestation of various autoimmune diseases and can lead to severe visual impairment. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial drug that is also used to treat autoimmune diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between HCQ use and the incidence of uveitis in patients with autoimmune diseases, as well as to identify potential risk factors for the development of uveitis in this study. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using a nationwide database to investigate the incidence of uveitis in patients with autoimmune diseases who received HCQ treatment. We selected non-HCQ comparison cohort at a 1:1 ratio by propensity score matching on age, sex, index date, urbanization, income, comorbidities, and medications. The data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Our study included 15 822 patients with autoimmune diseases. After 1:1 PSM, there were 4555 individuals in both the HCQ group (n = 4555) and the non-HCQ group (n = 4555). The multiple Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used for the estimation of adjusted hazard ratios on uveitis. After PSM, the adjusted hazard ratio for the HCQ group was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.58-0.95). These findings suggest that HCQ may play a protective role in reducing the risk of uveitis in patients with autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, and systemic lupus erythematosus groups. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves also showed a significantly lower incidence of uveitis in the HCQ group (log-rank = 0.0229) after PSM. CONCLUSION: HCQ use is associated with a lower incidence of uveitis in patients with autoimmune diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm this association and to investigate the underlying mechanisms.

Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with IgA Nephropathy: A Meta-Analysis.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Wanfang database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP database up to February 2023 were searched for associated studies comparing HCQ with any other nonHCQ for treating IgAN. The effects of proteinuria, a 50% decrease in proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and adverse events in patients with IgAN were examined in a meta-analysis. Data were extracted and pooled using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two retrospective and two prospective studies (675 patients) that matched our inclusion criteria were identified. Compared with a control group, HCQ significantly reduced proteinuria (mean difference (MD): -0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.44 to -0.08, p < 0.01). Patients receiving HCQ plus renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASSi) had a better efficacy in proteinuria alleviation and a 50% decrease in proteinuria compared with control groups (MD: -0.38, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.25, p < 0.001 and relative risk (RR) = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.73 to 6.36, p < 0.001). No appreciable variations were observed in eGFR between HCQ groups and control groups in treating patients with IgAN (MD: -2.00, 95% CI: -4.36 to 0.36, p = 0.10). Moreover, no serious adverse events were observed during HCQ treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate HCQ is an efficient, secure treatment for IgAN.

Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with screening practices for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy.

In this nationwide population-based cohort study, we investigated the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening using the National Health Insurance Review and Assessment database in South Korea. This study included a total of 32,732 at-risk patients, identified based on having been prescribed hydroxychloroquine for at least 6 months, and 15,477 long-term (> 5 years) users between January 2010 and December 2020. Participants were categorized based on the performance of baseline examinations (within 1 year of hydroxychloroquine use) and monitoring examinations (after 5 years of hydroxychloroquine use). Demographic and clinical factors, including hospitals and medical specialties prescribing hydroxychloroquine, indications for hydroxychloroquine use, and prescription details, were compared between groups. Significant differences were found in sex, residence, departments and hospitals (primary vs. referral centers) where hydroxychloroquine was prescribed, diagnosis for hydroxychloroquine therapy, and mean daily dose between patients who did and did not undergo baseline or monitoring examinations (all P < 0.01). Patients who received hydroxychloroquine prescriptions from referral hospitals were more likely to undergo baseline and monitoring examinations compared to those from primary clinics (both P < 0.001). Additionally, patients who received hydroxychloroquine prescriptions from the rheumatology department and had systemic lupus erythematosus were more likely to undergo baseline and monitoring examinations compared to other patients (all P < 0.001). There were notable differences in the number of modalities used for retinopathy screening between primary and referral centers (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that several clinical factors related to hydroxychloroquine prescription and screening centers are associated with retinopathy screening practices.

Hydroxychloroquine exacerbates imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like dermatitis through stimulating overexpression of IL-6 in keratinocytes.

OBJECTIVE: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) through inhibition of antigen presentation and subsequent reduction in T cell activation. Psoriasis relapse after antimalarial therapy have been reported in up to 18% of patients with psoriasis. Here, we explored the role of HCQ on exacerbating dermatitis utilizing an imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriasis-like dermatitis mouse model. METHODS: Thirty-six C57BL/6 female mice were divided into six groups: wild-type control, IMQ-Only, pre-treat HCQ (30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg HCQ), and co-treat HCQ with IMQ (30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg HCQ). Besides control, all were topically treated with IMQ for 5 days. Pharmacological effects and mechanisms of HCQ were assessed by clinical severity of dermatitis, histopathology, and flow cytometry. HaCaT cells were co-treated with both HCQ and recombinant IL-17A, followed by the detection of proinflammatory cytokine expression and gene profiles through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: In the pre-treated and co-treated HCQ groups, skin redness and scaling were significantly increased compared to the IMQ-Only group, and Th17 cell expression was also upregulated. Acanthosis and CD11b+IL23+ dendritic cell (DC) infiltration were observed in the HCQ treatment group. IL-6 overexpression was detected in both the HaCaT cells and skin from the experimental mice. Psoriasis-related genes were regulated after being co-treated with HCQ and recombinant IL-17A in HaCaT cells. CONCLUSIONS: HCQ exacerbates psoriasis-like skin inflammation by increasing the expression of IL-6, stimulating DC infiltration, and promoting Th17 expression in the microenvironment of the skin. KEY MESSAGES: This study provided possible mechanisms for inducing psoriasis during HCQ treatment through an animal model.

Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 story: is the low-dose treatment the missing link? A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been repurposed and used for the treatment of COVID-19 patients; however, its efficacy remains controversial, maybe partly due to the dosage, ranging from 200 to 800 mg/day, reported in different studies. Indeed, HCQ low dose (≤ 2.4 g/5 days) showed a lower risk of side effects compared to high doses. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of low-dose HCQ used alone on three outcomes including in-hospital mortality, the need for mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission in COVID-19 patients. A systematic review of English literature was conducted from January 2020 to April 2022, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies reporting a dosage of 400 mg twice the first day, followed by 200 mg twice for four days were included. Pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models. Eleven studies (12,503 patients) were retained in the quantitative analysis, four observational cohort studies, and seven RCTs. When pooling both observational and RCTs, low-dose HCQ was associated with decreased mortality (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: [0.55-0.97], I2 = 58%), but not with mechanical ventilation need (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: [0.56-1.89], I2 = 67%) and ICU admission rate (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: [0.42-1.17], I2 = 47%). However, no effect was observed when pooling only RCTs. Despite RCTs limitations, treatment with low-dose HCQ was not associated with improvement in mortality, mechanical ventilation need and ICU admission rate in COVID-19 patients.

Hydroxychloroquine use is associated with reduced mortality risk in older adults with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: There is little robust data about the cardiovascular safety of hydroxychloroquine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who often have cardiovascular comorbidities. We examined the association between use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with RA and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years with RA, we identified patients who initiated HCQ (users) and who did not initiate HCQ (non-users) between January 2015-June 2017. Each HCQ user was matched to 2 non-users of HCQ using propensity score derived from patient baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MACE, defined as acute admissions for stroke, myocardial infarction, or heart failure. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the composite of MACE and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare outcomes between HCQ users to non-users. RESULTS: The study included 2380 RA patients with incident HCQ use and matched 4633 HCQ non-users over the study period. The mean follow-up duration was 1.67 and 1.63 years in HCQ non-users and users, respectively. In multivariable models, use of HCQ was not associated with the risk of MACE (hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI: 0.832-1.33). However, use of HCQ was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.45-0.64) and the composite of all-cause mortality and MACE (HR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.58-0.78). CONCLUSION: HCQ use was independently associated with a lower risk of mortality in older adults with RA but not with incidence of MACE events. Key Points • Using an incident user design (to avoid the biases of a prevalent user design) and a population-based approach, we examined the effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) on the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in older patients with RA. • We did not find an association between HCQ use and incident MACE. We did, however, find a significant association with the composite outcome (MACE and all-cause mortality) driven by a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with HCQ use.

Clinical effectiveness of finasteride versus hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of frontal fibrosing alopecia: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a cicatricial alopecia with rapid epidemic growth. However, there is no agreement on the best therapeutic approach. AIMS: To compare the therapeutic effects of finasteride as a first-line systemic treatment of FFA versus hydroxychloroquine as a relatively safe and effective immunosuppressive drug. METHODS: Thirty-four female FFA patients were randomly assigned to receive either 400 mg/day of hydroxychloroquine or 2.5 mg/day of finasteride for 6 months. Topical treatments in both groups include pimecrolimus, mometasone, and minoxidil. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Score (FFASS), photography, and trichoscopy after 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Both the finasteride and hydroxychloroquine groups showed significant improvements in FFASS and trichoscopic scores (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups during the study. Photographic assessment showed that more than 60% of patients in both groups had improved without statistically significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both finasteride and hydroxychloroquine are equally effective, safe, and well-tolerable for treating FFA patients.

Effects of hydroxychloroquine therapy on choroidal volume and choroidal vascularity index.

PURPOSE: To determine changes in choroidal volume (CV) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) in patients on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) therapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients on HCQ therapy. CV and CVI were assessed below the central foveal region on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography using an automatic denoising and localization algorithm. CV and CVI were compared with age-matched controls. Regression analyses were performed to generate associations between CV and CVI with demographics and HCQ treatment parameters. Associations were assessed using a generalized estimating equation model adjusted for intra-subject inter-eye correlations. RESULTS: A total of 137 adult patients (23 males and 114 females) were included. Mean age was 45.6 ± 13.7 years and most patients identified as Caucasian (79%). Total duration of HCQ therapy ranged from 3 months to 20 years. Daily HCQ intake varied from 150-600 mg (mean = 304 mg), while cumulative doses ranged from 18-2,800 g. At presentation, the median CV was 0.51 (IQR:0.356-0.747) mm, and median CVI was 0.559 (IQR:0.528-0.578). Increased cumulative HCQ dose was associated with decreased CV (p = 0.006). Compared to age-matched controls, CV, CVI, and luminal area were significantly lower in the study group (p = 0.0003, 0.0001, and 0.0002). CONCLUSION: In this study, we present a novel analysis of key biomarkers which predate the occurrence of HCQ retinopathy. Choroidal volume and vascularity index are significantly reduced in patients on HCQ therapy, especially at higher cumulative doses. These findings suggest new tools to guide medical decision-making for patients receiving HCQ therapy for rheumatologic diseases.

Balancing risks and benefits in the use of hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids in systemic lupus erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and glucocorticoids (GCs) constitute the oldest and more used drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite this long experience, both are still subject to a number of uncertainties, mainly regarding the dose. AREAS COVERED: We review the main mechanisms of action, the clinical and toxic effects of HCQ and GCs and analyze the recommendations for the use of both in guidelines published since 2018. We offer a set of recommendations based on the pharmacology, mechanisms of action and clinical evidence. EXPERT OPINION: HCQ is the backbone therapy for SLE, and a judicious use must be accomplished, using doses that allow a good control of lupus without compromising the safety of treatments very much prolonged over the time. Stable doses of 200 mg/day seem to accomplish both conditions. GCs should be used more judiciously, with methyl-prednisolone pulses as the main therapy for inducing rapid remission and doses ≤5-2.5 mg/day be never exceeded in long-term maintenance treatments.

Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and prevention of COVID-19 severity in pregnant and postpartum women: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant women have an increased risk of severe COVID-19. Evaluation of drugs with a safety reproductive toxicity profile is a priority. At the beginning of the pandemic, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was recommended for COVID-19 treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in eight teaching hospitals in Spain to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HCQ in reducing viral shedding and preventing COVID-19 progression. Pregnant and postpartum women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR (with or without mild COVID-19 signs/symptoms) and a normal electrocardiogram were randomized to receive either HCQ orally (400 mg/day for 3 days and 200 mg/day for 11 days) or placebo. PCR and electrocardiogram were repeated at day 21 after treatment start. Enrollment was stopped before reaching the target sample due to low recruitment rate. Trial registration EudraCT #: 2020-001587-29, on April 2, 2020. CLINICAL TRIALS: gov # NCT04410562, registered on June 1, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 116 women (75 pregnant and 41 post-partum) were enrolled from May 2020 to June 2021. The proportion of women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR at day 21 was lower in the HCQ group (21.8%, 12/55) than in the placebo group (31.6%, 18/57), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.499). No differences were observed in COVID-19 progression, adverse events, median change in QTc, hospital admissions, preeclampsia or poor pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: HCQ was found to be safe in pregnant and postpartum women with asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although the prevalence of infection was decreased in the HCQ group, the statistical power was insufficient to confirm the potential beneficial effect of HCQ for COVID-19 treatment.